Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash costs 2.1x less per output token than Mistral Small 3.1 24B ($0.26 vs $0.555 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
0
Qwen3.5-FlashQwen
Coding
41.1
Overall
50.1
Output $/M
$0.26
28
vs boards won of 28 shared

Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.5-Flash: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5-Flash has a coding score, 41.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
28
Mistral Small 3.1 24B only
10
Qwen3.5-Flash only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked, Qwen3.5-Flash 41.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 24.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Mistral Small 3.1 24B 1253 against Qwen3.5-Flash 1445, 32.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 against Qwen3.5-Flash $0.26 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.5-Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Small 3.1 24BBarsQwen3.5-FlashTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards028
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1244Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.3%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured64.4%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured265.9Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding13091412Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT13011416Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1229Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1291Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.5Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 42 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured82.8%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.9%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured82.3%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12781403Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: expert12571407Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12901409Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1119Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1158Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
AIMENot measured92.5%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured84.4%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured18.2%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: math12611407Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711413Qwen3.5-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured84.1%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.3%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured56.0%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.6%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.0%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.3%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: science12651415Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12671407Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government12711398Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance12571394Qwen3.5-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
DTBenchNot measured82.9%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMCANot measured29.1%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text12771397Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following12631374Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing12521343Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Vision1136Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: English12951404Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English12551385Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese12531445Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: German12661390Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese12081369Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Korean12071344Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: French12731413Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish12841400Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian12631380Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Polish12421376Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn12701393Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries12991392Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language12681369Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12501347Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Vision: English1157Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1132Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1142Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1153Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1123Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0040Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.5-Flash
SpecificationMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5-Flash
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2025February 25, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.351$0.065
Output $/Mtok$0.555$0.26
Coding indexNot benchmarked41.1
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.40
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than Qwen3.5-Flash for coding?

Only Qwen3.5-Flash has a coding score, 41.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 per million input tokens and $0.555 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.065 and $0.26. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5-Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen3.5-Flash comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Small 3.1 24B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next