Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 cost about the same per output token ($2.00 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
1
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
10
vs boards won of 11 shared

Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
11
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
63
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
14
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 43.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AIME: Mistral Medium 3.1 42.3% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 86.0%, 43.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.1BarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding02
Reasoning10
Math01
Knowledge05
General02
All shared boards110
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Coding Index20.5Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)44.8%85.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCode32.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
ALE-Bench210.2608.9Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMArena Text: coding1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Agentic Index1.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)63.0%22.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1426Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1408Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1435Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIME42.3%86.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index38.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)38.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: math1408Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1412Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU Pro75.3%87.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LegalBench (Vals AI)62.0%85.1%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.7%65.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)36.5%60.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MedQA (Vals AI)78.2%95.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: science1444Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1449Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1439Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1418Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites1132Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1097Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1073Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1144Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1081Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG992Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art997Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench39.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)42.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
DTBench67.5%80.5%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMCA19.1%36.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1424Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1398Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1391Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: English1438Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1408Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1447Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: German1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1380Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: French1460Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1411Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1418Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1406Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1395Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1390Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: English1179Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1190Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1168Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1147Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1200Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 13, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next