Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Mistral Medium 3.1 leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 7.6, and Qwen3 30B A3B costs 4.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 46 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
39
Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
7
vs boards won of 46 shared

Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for a larger context window (131K against 41K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
46
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
28
Qwen3 30B A3B only
6
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 21.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Mistral Medium 3.1 42.7% against Qwen3 30B A3B 0.0%, 42.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.1BarsQwen3 30B A3BTies
Coding31
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning32
Math22
Knowledge41
Web design50
General201
All shared boards397
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding Index20.5Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.6%50.6%Qwen3 30B A3B
SciCode32.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%6.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
WeirdMLNot measured29.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
ALE-Bench210.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14331337Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14361340Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.27.6Mistral Medium 3.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured137.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.6%26.0%Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)63.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%61.6%Qwen3 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%6.2%Qwen3 30B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured61.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261314Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: expert14081314Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351329Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AIME42.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index38.372.3Qwen3 30B A3B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)38.3%72.3%Qwen3 30B A3B
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math14081355Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14121363Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%77.7%Qwen3 30B A3B
LMArena Text: science14441321Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14491318Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14391314Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14181309Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1132954Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: UI components1097943Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: game dev1073898Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: data viz1144967Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: 3D1081Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1120941Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: SVG992Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art997Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index201
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
IFBench39.8%41.5%Qwen3 30B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)42.7%0.0%Mistral Medium 3.1
DTBench67.5%60.3%Mistral Medium 3.1
LMCA19.1%15.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured40.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text14241317Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: instruction following13981283Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: creative writing13911271Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: English14381335Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: non-English14081295Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14471347Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: German14321307Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13791254Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Korean13801261Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: French14601352Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14331317Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Russian14111291Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Polish14301299Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14181307Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14061312Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13951290Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13901258Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: English1179Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1190Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1168Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1147Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1200Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 30B A3B
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 13, 2025April 28, 2025
Context window131K41K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.12
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for a larger context window (131K against 41K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Mistral Medium 3.1, with 131K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison based on?

46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next