Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Nemo
Updated October 21, 2026. 1 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
- Shared results
- 1
- Mistral Medium 3.1 only
- 73
- Mistral Nemo only
- 2
- Like-for-like categories
- 1 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 9.2.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.9.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a AIME result, 42.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a MMLU Pro result, 75.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1133.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 131K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
Mistral Medium 3.1 $0.0014, Mistral Nemo $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Mistral Nemo not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 18.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- DTBench: Mistral Medium 3.1 67.5% against Mistral Nemo 48.6%, 18.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Mistral Nemo $0.15 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 131K tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Bars | Mistral Nemo | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 0 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 20.5 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 44.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 40.6% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| SciCode | 32.4% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 10.6% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 210.2 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1433 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1436 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 9.2 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 118.7 | Only Mistral Nemo measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.9 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 40.6% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 63.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 58.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.7% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1426 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1408 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1435 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1175 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1165 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 42.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 87.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 90.9% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| AA Math Index | 38.3 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 38.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1408 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1412 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 75.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 62.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 50.7% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 70.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 36.5% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 78.2% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 68.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MMLU | Not measured | 65.3% | Only Mistral Nemo measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1444 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1449 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1439 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1418 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1133 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1099 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1074 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1144 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1081 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1120 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 993 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 997 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 39.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 42.7% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| DTBench | 67.5% | 48.6% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| LMCA | 19.1% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1424 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1398 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1391 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1172 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1438 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1408 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1447 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1432 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1379 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1380 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1460 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1433 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1411 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1430 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1418 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1406 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1395 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1390 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1179 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1190 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1175 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1168 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1145 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1147 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1200 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Nemo costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Mistral Nemo costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Mistral Nemo costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | August 13, 2025 | July 19, 2024 |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.40 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Mistral Nemo for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo costs $0.15 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Mistral Nemo?
Neither: both take 131K tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Nemo comparison based on?
1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Nemo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.