Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Large vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads Mistral Large on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 5.8, and Qwen3.6 27B costs 2.2x less per output token ($2.70 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
6
vs boards won of 6 shared

Mistral Large or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick

Only Qwen3.6 27B has a coding score, 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
6
Mistral Large only
38
Qwen3.6 27B only
18
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Large not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 34.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Mistral Large 35.1% against Qwen3.6 27B 84.2%, 49.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Large $6.00 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Mistral Large takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.6 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral LargeBarsQwen3.6 27BTies
Intelligence02
Reasoning02
Knowledge01
General01
All shared boards06
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured53.7Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)37.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.9%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)17.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
SciCodeNot measured42.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text: coding1275Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1274Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.821.4Qwen3.6 27B
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1146.2Qwen3.6 27B
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured18.5Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond47.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)35.1%84.2%Qwen3.6 27B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.5%23.1%Qwen3.6 27B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.9%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured7.0%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1257Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: expert1208Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1268Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
AIME9.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured91.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured35.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text: math1261Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1257Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
MMLU Pro69.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured53.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured62.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)63.8%71.3%Qwen3.6 27B
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
MedQA (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)51.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MMLU68.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: science1260Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1255Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1275Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1238Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
IFBenchNot measured67.6%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
DTBench60.8%78.1%Qwen3.6 27B
LMCANot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text1265Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1249Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1242Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: English1284Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: non-English1235Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1239Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: German1242Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1170Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: Korean1202Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: French1325Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1268Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: Russian1252Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: Polish1157Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1260Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1261Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1261Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1230Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Large and Qwen3.6 27B
SpecificationMistral LargeQwen3.6 27B
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 26, 2024April 27, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.45
Output $/Mtok$6.00$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked36.8
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.30
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Large better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?

Only Qwen3.6 27B has a coding score, 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large or Qwen3.6 27B?

Mistral Large costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.6 27B only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Large or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Large vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Large's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next