Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Large vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads Mistral Large on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 17.7 to 5.8, and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs 2.9x less per output token ($2.08 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.08
32
vs boards won of 32 shared

Mistral Large or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Large for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
32
Mistral Large only
12
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
19
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Large not benchmarked, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 32.8 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Mistral Large 35.1% against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 85.7%, 50.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Large $6.00 against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B $2.08 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Mistral Large takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral LargeBarsQwen3.5-122B-A10BTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards032
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1361Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured43.3Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)37.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)17.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
SciCodeNot measured39.7%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.1%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: coding12751436Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: software and IT12741436Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1353Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1351Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.817.7Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.6%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
GPQA Diamond47.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)35.1%85.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.5%25.2%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12571421Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: expert12081431Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12681431Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1261Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
AIME9.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: math12611431Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12571431Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
MMLU Pro69.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)51.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MMLU68.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: science12601432Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12551423Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: legal and government12751422Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: business and finance12381414Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
IFBenchNot measured75.7%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured76.3%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
DTBench60.8%84.3%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMCANot measured32.2%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text12651417Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: instruction following12491399Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: creative writing12421368Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena VisionNot measured1244Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: English12841428Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: non-English12351401Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: Chinese12391463Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: German12421425Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: Japanese11701367Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: Korean12021353Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: French13251443Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: Spanish12681425Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: Russian12521400Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: Polish11571398Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: multi-turn12601416Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: longer queries12611410Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: writing and language12611387Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12301366Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1301Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1251Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1243Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.0013Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.019Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.073Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Large and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
SpecificationMistral LargeQwen3.5-122B-A10B
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 26, 2024February 25, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.26
Output $/Mtok$6.00$2.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Large better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Mistral Large costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.26 and $2.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Large or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Large vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Large's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next