Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Large vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads Mistral Large on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.7 to 5.8, and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 15.0x less per output token ($0.40 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
8
Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
27
vs boards won of 35 shared

Mistral Large or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Large for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
35
Mistral Large only
9
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
18
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Large not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 7.5 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run): Mistral Large 51.5% against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 72.0%, 20.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Large $6.00 against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Mistral Large takes 128K tokens, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral LargeBarsQwen2.5 72B InstructTies
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge06
General89
All shared boards827
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)37.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)17.8%27.6%Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WeirdMLNot measured16.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding12751292Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT12741292Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.87.7Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1129.0Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
METR time horizonsNot measured35.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured16.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured5.7%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond47.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)35.1%49.1%Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.5%3.6%Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.1%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured79.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12571271Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert12081245Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12681279Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AIME9.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.1%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
MATH level 5Not measured63.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12611283Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12571290Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro69.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)51.5%72.0%Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
MMLU68.8%85.3%Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured94.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12601275Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12551258Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government12751288Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance12381253Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index89
General benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured36.9%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
DTBench60.8%62.9%Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMCANot measured13.4%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
HellaSwagNot measured84.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured82.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQANot measured82.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12651269Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12491254Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing12421221Mistral Large
LMArena Text: English12841283Mistral Large
LMArena Text: non-English12351252Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese12391273Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: German12421234Mistral Large
LMArena Text: Japanese11701180Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean12021188Mistral Large
LMArena Text: French13251280Mistral Large
LMArena Text: Spanish12681255Mistral Large
LMArena Text: Russian12521264Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish1157Not measuredOnly Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12601272Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12611281Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language12611247Mistral Large
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12301211Mistral Large
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Large and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
SpecificationMistral LargeQwen2.5 72B Instruct
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 26, 2024September 19, 2024
Context window128K33K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.36
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Large better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Mistral Large costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Large or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Mistral Large, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Large vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Large's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next