Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

MiniMax M2.5 leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 9.9, and MiniMax M2.5 costs 1.6x less per output token ($1.20 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Coding
37.2
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$1.20
7
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
28
vs boards won of 35 shared

MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
35
MiniMax M2.5 only
36
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
14
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.5 37.2 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 41.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: MiniMax M2.5 95.3% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 41.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.5 $1.20 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.5 takes 205K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.5BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding12
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning23
Math02
Knowledge04
General217
All shared boards728
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1386Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%11.4%MiniMax M2.5
Terminal-Bench42.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ALE-Bench618.2Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding13801438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT13831442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena WebDev: React1374Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1414Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA10.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring19.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing18.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.89.9MiniMax M2.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.3%54.1%MiniMax M2.5
Vending-Bench 2-$23Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond82.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%77.2%MiniMax M2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%11.9%MiniMax M2.5
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13721428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert13781442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13841439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
ProofBench4.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13781425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work13781419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro80.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science13691444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13571431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government13661438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance13561433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1222Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1170Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1176Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1172Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1170Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1207Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index217
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench71.6%56.5%MiniMax M2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%63.7%MiniMax M2.5
CL-bench11.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CL-bench Life6.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text13591420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following13531406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13311366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English13801429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English13381405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese13931463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German13611424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese11711385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean12331394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French13631452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish13531428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian13591408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish13341419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn13641428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries13661419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13451392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13291368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.072Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 12, 2026September 23, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.21
Output $/Mtok$1.20$1.90
Coding index37.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.5 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next