LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Coding
59.4
Overall
22.8
Output $/M
$0.95
11
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
60.4
Overall
9.6
Output $/M
$0.28
0
vs boards won of 11 shared

Decision reading

MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct are level for coding, 59.4 against 60.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick MiniMax M2.5 when what matters is SWE-bench Verified or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads. Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct when output tokens cost 3.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 205K tokens.

Shared results
11
MiniMax M2.5 only
56
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
5
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.5 59.4 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 60.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 60.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: MiniMax M2.5 95.3% against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 34.5%, 60.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.5 $0.95 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.28 per million output tokens, 3.4x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.5 takes 205K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.5BarsQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Web design30
General20
All shared boards110
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.8%60.4%MiniMax M2.5
SWE-bench LiteNot measured49.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1386Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%15.2%MiniMax M2.5
Terminal-Bench42.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ALE-Bench618.2Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1380Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1383Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1374Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1414Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.89.6MiniMax M2.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.3%34.5%MiniMax M2.5
Vending-Bench 2-$23Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond82.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%51.6%MiniMax M2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%3.8%MiniMax M2.5
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1372Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1384Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured29.0Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.0%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
ProofBench4.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro80.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1369Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1357Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1356Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites12221087MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: UI components11721046MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: game dev1176Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz11711085MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: 3D1170Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1207Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1147Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
IFBench71.6%32.7%MiniMax M2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%32.7%MiniMax M2.5
CL-bench11.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CL-bench Life6.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1380Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1338Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1393Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1171Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1233Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1334Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1364Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1345Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.0007Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.016Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0043Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.064Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.017Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 12, 2026July 31, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.07
Output $/Mtok$0.95$0.28
Coding index59.460.4
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.5 better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct are level for coding, 59.4 against 60.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick MiniMax M2.5 when what matters is SWE-bench Verified or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads. Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct when output tokens cost 3.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 205K tokens.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.95 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.07 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. MiniMax M2.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next