Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

MiniMax M2.5 leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 4.0x less per output token ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Coding
37.2
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$1.20
9
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
26
vs boards won of 35 shared

MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens).

Shared results
35
MiniMax M2.5 only
36
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
10
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.5 37.2 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 67.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: MiniMax M2.5 95.3% against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 28.1%, 67.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.5 $1.20 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.5 takes 205K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.5BarsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding12
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning23
Math02
Knowledge04
General415
All shared boards926
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
SWE-bench Verified75.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1386Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCodeNot measured33.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%6.1%MiniMax M2.5
Terminal-Bench42.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ALE-Bench618.2Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding13801416Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT13831417Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena WebDev: React1374Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1414Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA10.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring19.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing18.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.87.5MiniMax M2.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.3%28.1%MiniMax M2.5
Vending-Bench 2-$23Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond82.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%70.7%MiniMax M2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%10.3%MiniMax M2.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured55.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13721398Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: expert13781397Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13841406Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured66.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
ProofBench4.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13781394Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: mathematical work13781411Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro80.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science13691393Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13571392Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government13661387Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance13561389Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites1222Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1170Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1176Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1172Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1170Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1207Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index415
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench71.6%50.7%MiniMax M2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%61.3%MiniMax M2.5
DTBenchNot measured67.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured22.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
CL-bench11.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CL-bench Life6.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text13591384Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following13531363Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing13311317MiniMax M2.5
LMArena Text: English13801391Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: non-English13381372Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese13931432Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: German13611379Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese11711337Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Korean12331330Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: French13631419Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Spanish13531404Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Russian13591369Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Polish13341353Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: multi-turn13641378Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: longer queries13661378Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language13451336MiniMax M2.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13291334Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.072Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 12, 2026July 29, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.09
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.30
Coding index37.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.5 better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next