Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

MiniMax M2.5 leads Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 12.0, and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 1.5x less per output token ($0.775 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Coding
37.2
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$1.20
15
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
0
vs boards won of 15 shared

MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.775 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens).

Shared results
15
MiniMax M2.5 only
56
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.5 37.2 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 42.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: MiniMax M2.5 63.7% against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 11.0%, 52.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.5 $1.20 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.5 takes 205K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.5BarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning40
Web design60
General20
All shared boards150
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
SWE-bench Verified75.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1386Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCodeNot measured41.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%15.2%MiniMax M2.5
Terminal-Bench42.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ALE-Bench618.2Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1380Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1383Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1374Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1414Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA10.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring19.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing18.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.812.0MiniMax M2.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.3%53.2%MiniMax M2.5
Vending-Bench 2-$23Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured52.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond82.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%79.0%MiniMax M2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%15.9%MiniMax M2.5
ARC-AGI63.7%11.0%MiniMax M2.5
ARC-AGI-24.9%1.3%MiniMax M2.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts1372Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1379Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1384Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured91.0Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ProofBench4.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro80.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science1369Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1357Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1356Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites12221058MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: UI components1170963MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: game dev1176951MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: data viz11721070MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: 3D1170995MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: all code categories12071038MiniMax M2.5
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench71.6%51.2%MiniMax M2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%72.0%MiniMax M2.5
DTBenchNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured23.5%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
CL-bench11.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CL-bench Life6.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1380Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1338Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1393Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1171Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1233Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1334Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1364Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1345Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.072Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 12, 2026July 21, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.145
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.775
Coding index37.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.5 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Only MiniMax M2.5 has a coding score, 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.775 vs $1.20 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. MiniMax M2.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next