Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

MiniMax M2.1 leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.9 to 9.6, at about the same output price ($1.20 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
9
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
2
vs boards won of 11 shared

MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2.1 for work measured by AA Math Index or AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
11
MiniMax M2.1 only
23
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct only
30
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 43.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: MiniMax M2.1 85.4% against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 41.5%, 43.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct $1.10 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.1 takes 205K tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.1BarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math02
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards92
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)81.0%78.4%MiniMax M2.1
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%9.8%MiniMax M2.1
Terminal-Bench36.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
ALE-Bench623.8Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1440Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1447Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.99.6MiniMax M2.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom85.4%41.5%MiniMax M2.1
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond78.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.0%75.9%MiniMax M2.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%12.6%MiniMax M2.1
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1428Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1417Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1431Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured66.7%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AIME77.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math Index82.784.3Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%84.3%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1440Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1434Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%82.4%MiniMax M2.1
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1434Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1431Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1422Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1201Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1220Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1134Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1206Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1164Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1190Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG1131Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
IFBench69.9%60.7%MiniMax M2.1
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)67.7%63.7%MiniMax M2.1
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured55.6%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1417Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1388Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1333Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1421Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1407Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1460Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1416Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1395Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1363Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1414Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1435Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1404Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1398Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1416Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1355Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1349Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0083Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
SpecificationMiniMax M2.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025September 11, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.20$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$0.59Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.1 better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2.1 for work measured by AA Math Index or AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.10 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next