Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

MiniMax M2.1 leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.9 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 5.5x less per output token ($0.22 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
8
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
3
vs boards won of 11 shared

MiniMax M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2.1 for work measured by AA Math Index or AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
11
MiniMax M2.1 only
23
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
31
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 44.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: MiniMax M2.1 85.4% against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 40.9%, 44.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 5.5x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.1 takes 205K tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.1BarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math02
Knowledge10
General11
All shared boards83
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured14.4Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)81.0%74.1%MiniMax M2.1
SciCodeNot measured30.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%13.6%MiniMax M2.1
Terminal-Bench36.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
ALE-Bench623.8Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1382Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.98.9MiniMax M2.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom85.4%40.9%MiniMax M2.1
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond78.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.0%75.7%MiniMax M2.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%11.4%MiniMax M2.1
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1376Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AIME77.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math Index82.791.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%91.0%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1371Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1375Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%79.4%MiniMax M2.1
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1353Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1349Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1345Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1201Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1220Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1134Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1207Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1166Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1190Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG1131Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
IFBench69.9%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)67.7%38.0%MiniMax M2.1
LMArena TextNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1304Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1270Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1320Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1396Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1376Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1304Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1302Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1319Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1300Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1284Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1294Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationMiniMax M2.1NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerMiniMaxNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025December 14, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.055
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.22
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$0.59Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.1 better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2.1 for work measured by AA Math Index or AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. MiniMax M2.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next