Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Large

Muse Glimmer 30B leads Mistral Large on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 17.5 to 5.8, and Muse Glimmer 30B costs 4.4x less per output token ($1.35 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
1
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Large: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.35 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
1
Muse Glimmer 30B only
4
Mistral Large only
43
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 11.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Muse Glimmer 30B 17.5 against Mistral Large 5.8, 11.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
Context window
Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Glimmer 30BBarsMistral LargeTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
AA Coding Index49.0Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.8%Only Mistral Large measured
ALE-Bench962.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1274Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index17.55.8Muse Glimmer 30B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured122.1Only Mistral Large measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
AA Agentic Index8.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.1%Only Mistral Large measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.5%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1208Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.5%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1255Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1238Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
DTBenchNot measured60.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena TextNot measured1265Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1249Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1284Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1235Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1239Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1170Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1202Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1325Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1252Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1157Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1230Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Large
SpecificationMeta Muse Glimmer 30BMistral Large
MakerMetaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 9, 2026February 26, 2024
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.325$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.35$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Mistral Large for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.35 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Large?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Large?

Muse Glimmer 30B, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Glimmer 30B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next