Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Ember vs Inkling 2 Small

Muse Ember leads Inkling 2 Small on coding, 64.9 to 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Ember costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse EmberMeta
Coding
64.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
9
T Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines
Coding
48.9
Overall
56.9
Output $/M
$1.00
6
vs boards won of 15 shared

Muse Ember or Inkling 2 Small: which to pick

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Inkling 2 Small.

Pick Inkling 2 Small for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena WebDev: React, where it leads.

Shared results
15
Muse Ember only
0
Inkling 2 Small only
36
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Ember 64.9 from 3 benchmarks, Inkling 2 Small 48.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 10.4 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Muse Ember 39.4% against Inkling 2 Small 12.6%, 35.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Ember $0.50 against Inkling 2 Small $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse EmberBarsInkling 2 SmallTies
Coding43
Agentic work31
Reasoning11
Knowledge01
General10
All shared boards96
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index43
Coding benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
LMArena WebDev16091647Inkling 2 Small
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)39.4%12.6%Muse Ember
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.7%81.5%Muse Ember
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SciCodeNot measured52.3%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%13.1%Muse Ember
FrontierCode 2.027.2%25.4%Muse Ember
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1455Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1443Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena WebDev: React16161660Inkling 2 Small
LMArena WebDev: HTML16211661Inkling 2 Small
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured97.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured30.6Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)38.2%38.9%Inkling 2 Small
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)49.0%46.6%Muse Ember
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%21.7%Muse Ember
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured32.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
APEX-Agents64.3%46.8%Muse Ember
MCP AtlasNot measured85.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured44.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.1%28.7%Inkling 2 Small
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%35.0%Muse Ember
ARC-AGINot measured96.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured81.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1421Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1478Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1424Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
MathArenaNot measured42.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
AA-Omniscience7.716.1Inkling 2 Small
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1409Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1415Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
Vals Index60.5%56.1%Muse Ember
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured88.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
GDPval-AANot measured1630Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena TextNot measured1403Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1408Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1348Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1418Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1377Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1408Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1403Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1381Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1359Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkMuse EmberInkling 2 SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0003Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.0008Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0065Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.018Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.025Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.070Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Ember and Inkling 2 Small
SpecificationMeta Muse EmberThinking Machines Inkling 2 Small
MakerMetaThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026November 9, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.50$1.00
Coding index64.948.9
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Ember better than Inkling 2 Small for coding?

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Inkling 2 Small. Pick Inkling 2 Small for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena WebDev: React, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Muse Ember or Inkling 2 Small?

Muse Ember costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Inkling 2 Small costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Ember or Inkling 2 Small?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Ember vs Inkling 2 Small comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Muse Ember's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Inkling 2 Small's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small" title="Muse Ember vs Inkling 2 Small, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small">LLMBenchmark.ai, Muse Ember vs Inkling 2 Small</a></p>