Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 leads Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 7.7, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs 2.8x less per output token ($0.72 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
26.0
Output $/M
$0.72
2
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
40
vs boards won of 42 shared

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($0.72 vs $2.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
42
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
10
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
32
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 27.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Korean: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 1142 against Mistral Medium 3.1 1380, 39.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 against Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 2.8x apart.
Context window
Both take 131K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.3 70B InstructBarsMistral Medium 3.1Ties
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge14
General120
All shared boards240
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Coding Index11.920.5Mistral Medium 3.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%40.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
SciCodeNot measured32.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%10.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
WeirdML14.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured210.2Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding12681433Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: software and IT12731436Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.79.2Mistral Medium 3.1
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.9Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom26.6%40.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
BALROG23.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)31.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured63.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.8%58.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%4.7%Mistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SimpleBench19.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12571426Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: expert12251408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771435Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AIMENot measured42.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured87.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index7.738.3Mistral Medium 3.1
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.7%38.3%Mistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME5.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
MATH level 541.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12671408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work12671412Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured62.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.3%68.3%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MMLU86.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12841444Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751449Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: legal and government12841439Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: business and finance12431418Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1133Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1100Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1074Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1144Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1081Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1120Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured997Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
IFBench47.1%39.8%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)15.7%42.7%Mistral Medium 3.1
DTBench59.5%67.5%Mistral Medium 3.1
LMCA17.5%19.1%Mistral Medium 3.1
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12741424Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12421398Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12501391Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: English13031438Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: non-English12361408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Chinese12171447Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: German12511432Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Japanese11501379Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Korean11421380Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: French12821460Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Spanish12691433Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Russian12521411Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Polish12591430Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801418Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: longer queries12551406Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: writing and language12551395Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12411390Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1179Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1190Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1168Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1147Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1200Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.1
MakerMeta LlamaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 6, 2024August 13, 2025
Context window131K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.45$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.72$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($0.72 vs $2.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $0.72 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Neither: both take 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next