Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Large

Updated October 21, 2026. 36 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$0.72
26
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.8
Output $/M
$6.00
10
vs boards won of 36 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 8.3x less, and where the context window is larger, 131K against 128K tokens.

Shared results
36
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
15
Mistral Large only
8
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 7.8 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run): Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 71.3% against Mistral Large 51.5%, 19.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.3 70B InstructBarsMistral LargeTies
Coding12
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge60
General108
All shared boards2610
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
AA Coding Index11.9Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%17.8%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
WeirdML14.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding12681275Mistral Large
LMArena Text: software and IT12731274Mistral Large
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.75.8Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3122.1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom26.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
BALROG23.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.8%35.1%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%3.5%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SimpleBench19.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12571257Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert12251208Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771268Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
AA Math Index7.7Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME5.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
MATH level 541.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12671261Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12671257Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.3%51.5%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MMLU86.3%68.8%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: science12841260Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751255Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government12841275Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance12431238Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index108
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
IFBench47.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)15.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
DTBench59.5%60.8%Mistral Large
LMCA17.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12741265Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12421249Mistral Large
LMArena Text: creative writing12501242Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: English13031284Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English12361235Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese12171239Mistral Large
LMArena Text: German12511242Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese11501170Mistral Large
LMArena Text: Korean11421202Mistral Large
LMArena Text: French12821325Mistral Large
LMArena Text: Spanish12691268Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian12521252Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish12591157Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801260Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12551261Mistral Large
LMArena Text: writing and language12551261Mistral Large
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12411230Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Large
MakerMeta LlamaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 6, 2024February 26, 2024
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.45$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.72$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than Mistral Large for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 8.3x less, and where the context window is larger, 131K against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Mistral Large?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $0.72 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Mistral Large?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next