Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Step 5 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 25 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
5.7
Output $/M
$0.3325
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.70
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Decision reading

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 8.1x less.

Shared results
25
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct only
9
Step 5 Preview only
36
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 63.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 4.3% against Step 5 Preview 88.3%, 84.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 8.1x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.2 3B InstructBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding10981485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT11031473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.743.7Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom21.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
BALROG10.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%46.5%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts10951461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert10901485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11411454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Math Index3.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)3.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: math11261458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work11281460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11061454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11041439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government11151437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance10741435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IFBench26.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)4.3%88.3%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text11101440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following10891438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing10941409Step 5 Preview
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: English11801447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English10191428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese10171500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1056Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1383Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian9491433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn11051437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries11001449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language10961425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media10831412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.2 3B InstructStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerMeta LlamaStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 25, 2024October 8, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.0505$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.3325$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked61.1
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 8.1x less.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Step 5 Preview?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 per million input tokens and $0.3325 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next