Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs 5.4x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 ($0.3325 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.3325
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
vs $0.3325 vs $1.80 per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 5.4x cheaper.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $1.80 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 5.4x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: coding1098Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1103Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.7Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom21.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
BALROG10.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)21.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1095Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1090Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1141Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIMENot measured86.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
AA Math Index3.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)3.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: math1126Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1128Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: science1106Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1104Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1115Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1074Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench26.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCANot measured36.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1110Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1089Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1094Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1180Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1019Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1017Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1056Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian949Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1105Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1100Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1096Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1083Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 25, 2024April 27, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.0505$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.3325$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $1.80 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 per million input tokens and $0.3325 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next