Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 22.5x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 ($0.08 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 22.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.80 per million).

Shared results
5
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
46
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
20
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 85.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 1.7% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 86.7%, 85.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 22.5x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Math01
General02
All shared boards05
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Coding Index5.4Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
WeirdML1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: coding1195Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1195Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.9Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5146.2Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%84.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1175Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1144Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1196Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIMENot measured86.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%86.7%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1179Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1180Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1193Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1182Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1206Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1166Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
DTBench50.9%80.5%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMCA5.4%36.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1187Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1159Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1154Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1218Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1148Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1151Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1144Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1061Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1053Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1178Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1169Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1158Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1172Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1181Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1162Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1145Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024April 27, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.08$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 22.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.80 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next