Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mistral Large 3 2512

Mistral Large 3 2512 leads Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.3 to 6.6, and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs 2.7x less per output token ($0.56 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.3
Output $/M
$0.56
0
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Mistral Large 3 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.56 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or DTBench, where it leads.

Shared results
3
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only
44
Mistral Large 3 2512 only
25
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Mistral Large 3 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 3.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
DTBench: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 60.0% against Mistral Large 3 2512 65.1%, 5.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.56 against Mistral Large 3 2512 $1.50 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Mistral Large 3 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 70B InstructBarsMistral Large 3 2512Ties
Intelligence01
General02
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.1Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured55.3%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
WeirdML9.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured264.7Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text: coding1260Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1260Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.69.3Mistral Large 3 2512
Epoch Capabilities Index125.9Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
BALROG27.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany6.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured68.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)44.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1241Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1209Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1261Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AIMENot measured42.9%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
AA Math Index4.0Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME3.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
MATH level 536.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1252Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1253Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
MMLU ProNot measured79.8%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured52.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)67.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
MMLU80.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1276Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1257Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1283Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1235Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1162Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1099Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1080Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1136Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1099Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1141Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured992Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1069Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured24.6%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
IFBench34.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
DTBench60.0%65.1%Mistral Large 3 2512
LMCA14.8%16.7%Mistral Large 3 2512
LMArena Text1261Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1231Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1232Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1294Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1219Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1215Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1222Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1132Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1140Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1262Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1253Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1234Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1256Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1241Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1236Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1230Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.0013Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.030Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.029Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.118Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.115Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 3 2512
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Large 3 2512
MakerMeta LlamaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024December 1, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.56$0.50
Output $/Mtok$0.56$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.77
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better than Mistral Large 3 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.56 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or DTBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.56 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 2512 costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Large 3 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Mistral Large 3 2512, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mistral Large 3 2512 comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 3 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next