LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 0711 vs Hy3 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 7 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI
Coding
64.7
Overall
12.7
Output $/M
$2.30
0
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
22.4
Overall
25.3
Output $/M
$0.60
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Decision reading

Pick Kimi K2 0711 for coding: it scores 64.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.4 for Hy3 preview.

Pick Hy3 preview when output tokens cost 3.8x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 131K tokens.

Shared results
7
Kimi K2 0711 only
29
Hy3 preview only
29
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 0711 64.7 from 2 benchmarks, Hy3 preview 22.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 31.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Kimi K2 0711 61.1% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 31.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 0711 takes 131K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 0711BarsHy3 previewTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
General02
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
Aider polyglot59.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SWE-bench Verified71.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)70.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)55.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%34.1%Hy3 preview
Terminal-Bench27.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
GSO-Bench4.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
WeirdML39.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1421Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1423Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.725.3Hy3 preview
Epoch Capabilities Index140.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom61.1%92.7%Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond71.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.6%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%27.8%Hy3 preview
SimpleBench26.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1413Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1422Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
AIME62.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AA Math Index57.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)57.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1424Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1442Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1405Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1397Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1050Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Design Arena: UI components1030Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Design Arena: game dev974Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Design Arena: data viz1018Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1034Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
IFBench41.5%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)53.0%64.7%Hy3 preview
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)85.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
CL-bench11.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1401Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1383Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1339Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1409Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1435Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1425Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1370Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1352Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.0017Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.035Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.137Exceeds the context window
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 0711 and Hy3 preview
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711Tencent Hy3 preview
MakerMoonshot AITencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 11, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.57$0.18
Output $/Mtok$2.30$0.60
Coding index64.722.4
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 0711 better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Pick Kimi K2 0711 for coding: it scores 64.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.4 for Hy3 preview. Pick Hy3 preview when output tokens cost 3.8x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0711 or Hy3 preview?

Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0711 or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0711 vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2 0711's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next