LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 0711 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Updated October 21, 2026. 7 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI
Coding
64.7
Overall
12.7
Output $/M
$2.30
0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
65.5
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.50
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Decision reading

Kimi K2 0711 scores 64.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when output tokens cost 4.6x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Shared results
7
Kimi K2 0711 only
29
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
9
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 0711 64.7 from 2 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Reasoning, 23.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Kimi K2 0711 7.4% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 30.7%, 23.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 4.6x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 0711 takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 0711BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design04
General01
All shared boards07
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Aider polyglot59.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SWE-bench Verified71.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)70.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)55.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Terminal-Bench27.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
GSO-Bench4.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
WeirdML39.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.726.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Epoch Capabilities Index140.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench Telecom61.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
GPQA Diamond71.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%30.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SimpleBench26.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AIME62.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AA Math Index57.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)57.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websites10501171Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: UI components10301148Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: game dev9741108Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: data viz1018Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1132Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categories10341155Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBench41.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)53.0%69.0%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)85.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
CL-bench11.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.0017Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.035Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.137Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 0711 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMoonshot AINVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 11, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.57$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.30$0.50
Coding index64.765.5
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 0711 better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Kimi K2 0711 scores 64.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when output tokens cost 4.6x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0711 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0711 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0711 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2 0711's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next