Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 1.4x less per output token than Kimi K2 Thinking ($1.80 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
1
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
11
vs boards won of 12 shared

Kimi K2 Thinking or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for a lower cost per solved task ($0.61 against $1.35) and work measured by CaseLaw (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
12
Kimi K2 Thinking only
18
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
13
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 11.2 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Kimi K2 Thinking 63.1% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 85.3%, 22.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 Thinking takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 ThinkingBarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Math01
Knowledge14
General01
All shared boards111
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SWE-bench Verified63.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)63.1%85.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.2%71.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench35.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
WeirdML42.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ALE-Bench597.5608.9Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8146.2Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
METR time horizons59.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA Diamond78.5%87.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIME85.4%86.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MGSM (Vals AI)90.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math Index94.7Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)94.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU Pro81.1%87.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.2%85.1%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CaseLaw (Vals AI)65.7%59.7%Kimi K2 Thinking
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%65.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.6%95.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites1113Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench68.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCANot measured36.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench17.6%19.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 ThinkingQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerMoonshot AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 6, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved task$0.61$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for a lower cost per solved task ($0.61 against $1.35) and work measured by CaseLaw (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.61 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.35.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2 Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next