Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Lyria 3 Clip Preview

Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
22.0
Output $/M
$2.50
Lyria 3 Clip PreviewGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 262K vs 1.05M context window. Lyria 3 Clip Preview fits 4.0x more.

Kimi K2 Thinking or Lyria 3 Clip Preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Kimi K2 Thinking has results on SWE-bench Verified, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI); Lyria 3 Clip Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked, Lyria 3 Clip Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 against Lyria 3 Clip Preview Free per million output tokens.
Context window
Kimi K2 Thinking takes 262K tokens, Lyria 3 Clip Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified63.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)63.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench35.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
WeirdML42.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ALE-Bench597.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
METR time horizons59.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond78.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
AIME85.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math Index94.7Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)94.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro81.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)65.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1113Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
IFBench68.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CL-bench17.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Clip Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Clip Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Clip Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 ThinkingGoogle Lyria 3 Clip Preview
MakerMoonshot AIGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 6, 2025March 30, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60Free
Output $/Mtok$2.50Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$0.61Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking better than Lyria 3 Clip Preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or Lyria 3 Clip Preview?

Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs Free and Free. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2 Thinking only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or Lyria 3 Clip Preview?

Lyria 3 Clip Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Kimi K2 Thinking and Lyria 3 Clip Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Kimi K2 Thinking has results on SWE-bench Verified, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI); Lyria 3 Clip Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next