Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Nemotron 3 Super

Kimi K2.7 Code leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.8 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 8.9x less per output token ($0.45 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
56.7
Output $/M
$4.00
11
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
1
vs boards won of 12 shared

Kimi K2.7 Code or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 8.9x cheaper ($0.45 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.

Shared results
12
Kimi K2.7 Code only
39
Nemotron 3 Super only
26
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 20.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Kimi K2.7 Code 60.8 against Nemotron 3 Super 37.7, 23.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 8.9x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2.7 CodeBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding50
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning20
General11
All shared boards111
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena WebDev1474Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
AA Coding Index60.837.7Kimi K2.7 Code
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)47.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Code migration (Vals AI)25.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)50.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SciCode47.8%36.2%Kimi K2.7 Code
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)44.7%28.8%Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierCode30.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdML54.1%38.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
ALE-Bench886.2213.9Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1409Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena WebDev: React1475Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1451Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1513Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index25.812.8Kimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities Index150.1Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic Index21.01.7Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building web apps1176Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1175Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1143Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1138Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1147Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building games1130Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1151Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1129Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%67.8%Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents37.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,083Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%80.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)35.0%20.8%Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBench57.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzles14.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1386Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 354.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1380Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
SimpleQA Verified36.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1387Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1392Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1364Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1263Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: UI components1255Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: game dev1220Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: data viz1227Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: 3D1240Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: all code categories1252Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: SVG1176Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1196Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench63.1%71.5%Nemotron 3 Super
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%65.7%Kimi K2.7 Code
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena TextNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1347Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1400Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1431Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1369Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1362Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1332Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 CodeNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerMoonshot AINVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJune 12, 2026March 11, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.95$0.085
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.45
Coding index53.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.35Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 8.9x cheaper ($0.45 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Nemotron 3 Super?

Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.7 Code only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or Nemotron 3 Super?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.7 Code vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next