Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 2 vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads Mercury 2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.7 to 10.8, and Mercury 2 costs 3.6x less per output token ($0.75 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 26 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mercury 2Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
26
vs boards won of 26 shared

Mercury 2 or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.75 vs $2.70 per million).

Shared results
26
Mercury 2 only
16
Step 5 Preview only
35
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 2 not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 39.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Mercury 2 1160 against Step 5 Preview 1583, 70.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mercury 2 $0.75 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
Mercury 2 takes 128K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMercury 2BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Knowledge03
General012
All shared boards026
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev11711567Step 5 Preview
AA Coding Index31.1Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCode37.7%58.9%Step 5 Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
WeirdML43.2%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
ALE-Bench785.6Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: coding13901485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT13851473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: React11601583Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML11991556Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.843.7Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index1.6Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom70.8%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%46.5%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts13621461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert13581485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13741454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1458Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1460Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Knowledge benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
LMArena Text: science13431454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13631439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance13491435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1036Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: UI components996Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: game dev984Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1009Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: 3D982Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1021Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: SVG998Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art988Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IFBench69.8%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.7%88.3%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text13541440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13281438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing12861409Step 5 Preview
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: English13781447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13301428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14141500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1383Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian13041433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn13571437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13291449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13001425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13141412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 2 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationInception Mercury 2StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerInceptionStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 4, 2026October 8, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.75$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked61.1
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.75 vs $2.70 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Step 5 Preview?

Mercury 2 costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2 or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mercury 2 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mercury 2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next