Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Mistral Large

Mistral Large leads Granite 4.0 Micro on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 5.8 to 5.1, and Granite 4.0 Micro costs 53.6x less per output token ($0.112 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.0 MicroIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.112
2
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
3
vs boards won of 5 shared

Granite 4.0 Micro or Mistral Large: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for output tokens 53.6x cheaper ($0.112 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
5
Granite 4.0 Micro only
8
Mistral Large only
39
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.0 Micro not benchmarked, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 6.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run): Granite 4.0 Micro 44.7% against Mistral Large 51.5%, 6.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.0 Micro $0.112 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 53.6x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.0 Micro takes 131K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.0 MicroBarsMistral LargeTies
Coding10
Intelligence01
Reasoning11
Knowledge01
All shared boards23
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%17.8%Granite 4.0 Micro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1274Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.15.8Mistral Large
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured122.1Only Mistral Large measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom12.6%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%35.1%Mistral Large
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%3.5%Granite 4.0 Micro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)28.3%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1208Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
OTIS Mock AIME2.8%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)44.7%51.5%Mistral Large
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1255Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1238Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
IFBench24.8%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.0%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
DTBenchNot measured60.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena TextNot measured1265Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1249Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1284Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1235Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1239Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1170Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1202Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1325Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1252Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1157Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1230Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0001Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0012Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0045Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Large
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.0 MicroMistral Large
MakerIBM GraniteMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 20, 2025February 26, 2024
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.017$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.112$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Mistral Large for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for output tokens 53.6x cheaper ($0.112 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Mistral Large?

Granite 4.0 Micro costs $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.112 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.0 Micro or Mistral Large?

Granite 4.0 Micro, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.0 Micro vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Granite 4.0 Micro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next