gpt-oss-120b vs Mistral Large
Updated October 21, 2026. 43 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
gpt-oss-120b has the edge where output tokens cost 12.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 131K against 128K tokens.
- Shared results
- 43
- gpt-oss-120b only
- 35
- Mistral Large only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b leads, 11.6 against 5.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AA Agentic Index result, 3.7.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b leads, 78.5% against 47.7%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b leads, 92.6% against 9.2%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b leads, 79.2% against 69.7%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a Design Arena: websites result, 968.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b takes 131K tokens against 128K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b $0.0003, Mistral Large $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has the number, $0.51.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 38.1 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AIME: gpt-oss-120b 92.6% against Mistral Large 9.2%, 83.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- gpt-oss-120b $0.50 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 12.0x apart.
- Context window
- gpt-oss-120b takes 131K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | gpt-oss-120b | Bars | Mistral Large | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 6 | 0 | ||
| Math | 5 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 0 | ||
| General | 18 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 43 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 41.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | 26.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AA Coding Index | 30.4 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 83.2% | 37.1% | gpt-oss-120b |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 33.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.8% | 17.8% | gpt-oss-120b |
| SciCode | 34.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.5% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 18.7% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| WeirdML | 48.2% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| ALE-Bench | 575.6 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1379 | 1275 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1387 | 1274 | gpt-oss-120b |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 11.6 | 5.8 | gpt-oss-120b |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.8 | 122.1 | gpt-oss-120b |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 3.7 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 65.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| APEX-Agents | 4.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| METR time horizons | 56.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -$22 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 78.5% | 47.7% | gpt-oss-120b |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.2% | 35.1% | gpt-oss-120b |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 19.6% | 3.5% | gpt-oss-120b |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 75.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SimpleBench | 22.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 2.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1364 | 1257 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1356 | 1208 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1368 | 1268 | gpt-oss-120b |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 92.6% | 9.2% | gpt-oss-120b |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 94.8% | 74.4% | gpt-oss-120b |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 92.0% | 87.2% | gpt-oss-120b |
| AA Math Index | 93.4 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1389 | 1261 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1386 | 1257 | gpt-oss-120b |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 79.2% | 69.7% | gpt-oss-120b |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 75.9% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 48.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 58.2% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.6% | 63.8% | gpt-oss-120b |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 91.4% | 76.2% | gpt-oss-120b |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.8% | 51.5% | gpt-oss-120b |
| MMLU | Not measured | 68.8% | Only Mistral Large measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1382 | 1260 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1388 | 1255 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1355 | 1275 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1359 | 1238 | gpt-oss-120b |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 968 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 927 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 992 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 987 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 901 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 963 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 69.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 52.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| DTBench | 76.3% | 60.8% | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMCA | 22.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 77.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 25.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text | 1366 | 1265 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1318 | 1249 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1274 | 1242 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: English | 1375 | 1284 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1351 | 1235 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1385 | 1239 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: German | 1353 | 1242 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1331 | 1170 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1282 | 1202 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: French | 1370 | 1325 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1389 | 1268 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1343 | 1252 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1353 | 1157 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1340 | 1260 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1319 | 1261 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1306 | 1261 | gpt-oss-120b |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1292 | 1230 | gpt-oss-120b |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI gpt-oss-120b | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 5, 2025 | February 26, 2024 |
| Context window | 131K | 128K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.51 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is gpt-oss-120b better than Mistral Large for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. gpt-oss-120b has the edge where output tokens cost 12.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 131K against 128K tokens.
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Mistral Large?
gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for gpt-oss-120b only.
Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-120b or Mistral Large?
gpt-oss-120b, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks is the gpt-oss-120b vs Mistral Large comparison based on?
43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. gpt-oss-120b's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.