gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking leads gpt-oss-120b on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.0 to 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.
gpt-oss-120b or Kimi K2 Thinking: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.51 against $0.61).
- Shared results
- 29
- gpt-oss-120b only
- 52
- Kimi K2 Thinking only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking leads, 22.0 against 11.6.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AA Agentic Index result, 3.7.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Tied at 78.5%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b leads, 92.6% against 85.4%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking leads, 81.1% against 79.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking leads, 1113 against 967.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking takes 262K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b $0.0003, Kimi K2 Thinking $0.0019 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b $0.51, Kimi K2 Thinking $0.61.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked, Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Web design, 18.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- SWE-bench Verified: gpt-oss-120b 26.0% against Kimi K2 Thinking 63.4%, 37.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- gpt-oss-120b $0.50 against Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
- Context window
- gpt-oss-120b takes 131K tokens, Kimi K2 Thinking 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | gpt-oss-120b | Bars | Kimi K2 Thinking | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 3 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 2 | 1 tie | |
| Math | 2 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 7 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 1 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 6 | 22 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index35
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 41.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | 26.0% | 63.4% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| AA Coding Index | 30.4 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 83.2% | 63.1% | gpt-oss-120b |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 33.6% | 60.2% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.8% | 85.3% | gpt-oss-120b |
| SciCode | 34.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.5% | 31.1% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| Terminal-Bench | 18.7% | 35.7% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| WeirdML | 48.2% | 42.8% | gpt-oss-120b |
| ALE-Bench | 575.6 | 597.5 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1379 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1387 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SciCode | 7.7% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 11.6 | 22.0 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.8 | 145.8 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 3.7 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 65.8% | 93.0% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| APEX-Agents | 4.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| METR time horizons | 56.6% | 59.2% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -$22 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | 67.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 78.5% | 78.5% | Tie |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.2% | 83.8% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 19.6% | 23.8% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 75.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SimpleBench | 22.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 2.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1364 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1356 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1368 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 58.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 92.6% | 85.4% | gpt-oss-120b |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 94.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 92.0% | 90.2% | gpt-oss-120b |
| AA Math Index | 93.4 | 94.7 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.4% | 94.7% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1389 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1386 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 79.2% | 81.1% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 75.9% | 80.2% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 48.8% | 65.7% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 58.2% | 60.6% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.6% | 71.7% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 91.4% | 92.6% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.8% | 84.8% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| LMArena Text: science | 1382 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1388 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1355 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1359 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 967 | 1113 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| Design Arena: UI components | 924 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 992 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 987 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 901 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 962 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 69.0% | 68.1% | gpt-oss-120b |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 52.0% | 72.0% | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| DTBench | 76.3% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMCA | 22.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 77.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 17.6% | Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 25.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text | 1366 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1318 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1274 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1375 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1351 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1385 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1353 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1331 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1282 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1370 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1389 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1343 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1353 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1340 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1319 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1306 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1292 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Kimi K2 Thinking | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI gpt-oss-120b | MoonshotAI Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | August 5, 2025 | November 6, 2025 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $0.60 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $2.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.51 | $0.61 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is gpt-oss-120b better than Kimi K2 Thinking for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.51 against $0.61).
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Kimi K2 Thinking?
gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 and $2.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, gpt-oss-120b costs $0.51 and Kimi K2 Thinking $0.61.
Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-120b or Kimi K2 Thinking?
Kimi K2 Thinking, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison based on?
29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. gpt-oss-120b's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2 Thinking's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.