GPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra leads MiniMax M3.1 Flash on coding, 77.4 to 58.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 8.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 21 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-6.1 Terra or MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which to pick
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.9 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash.
Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 21
- GPT-6.1 Terra only
- 15
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra scores 77.4 against 58.9.
4 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra leads, 51.0 against 28.9.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-6.1 Terra has a Design Arena: websites result, 1283.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra leads, 60.5% against 53.8%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra $0.0035, MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 58.9 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 22.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- ALE-Bench: GPT-6.1 Terra 2608.8 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash 217.8, 79.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-6.1 Terra takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-6.1 Terra | Bars | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 8 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 3 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 3 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 17 | 4 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 94.3% | 83.9% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| LMArena WebDev | 1673 | 1582 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 49.5% | 25.3% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 84.0% | 73.9% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| SciCode | 55.1% | 53.4% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| ALE-Bench | 2608.8 | 217.8 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1657 | 1607 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1719 | 1539 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 51.0 | 28.9 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench research | 73.9% | 72.7% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| LiveBench browser | 93.1% | 80.6% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| LiveBench long agentic | 48.6% | 28.8% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 15.2% | 32.1% | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 26.0% | 34.1% | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 1.7% | 7.5% | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
| APEX-Agents | 68.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.7% | 82.9% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 46.2% | 48.0% | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 94.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 74.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| EBR-bench | 78.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | 35.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 90.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 92.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1283 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1277 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1348 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1295 | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| LiveBench design | 82.3% | 74.0% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 60.5% | 53.8% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| LiveBench data analysis | 82.3% | 71.4% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.3% | Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.7% | 79.7% | GPT-6.1 Terra |
| Furniture assembly | 79.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| MultiChallenge | 74.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 26, 2026 | October 19, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.00 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $5.00 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | 77.4 | 58.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-6.1 Terra better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding?
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.9 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?
GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Terra or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?
GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison based on?
21 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-6.1 Terra's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3.1 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.