Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

GPT-6.1 Terra leads MiniMax M3.1 Flash on coding, 77.4 to 58.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 8.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 21 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
Coding
77.4
Overall
76.8
Output $/M
$5.00
17
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
58.9
Overall
54.9
Output $/M
$0.60
4
vs boards won of 21 shared

GPT-6.1 Terra or MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which to pick

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.9 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
21
GPT-6.1 Terra only
15
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 58.9 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 22.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: GPT-6.1 Terra 2608.8 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash 217.8, 79.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-6.1 Terra takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraBarsMiniMax M3.1 FlashTies
Coding80
Intelligence10
Agentic work33
Reasoning11
Web design10
General30
All shared boards174
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding94.3%83.9%GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev16731582GPT-6.1 Terra
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%25.3%GPT-6.1 Terra
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.0%73.9%GPT-6.1 Terra
SciCode55.1%53.4%GPT-6.1 Terra
ALE-Bench2608.8217.8GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: React16571607GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: HTML17191539GPT-6.1 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index51.028.9GPT-6.1 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench research73.9%72.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
LiveBench browser93.1%80.6%GPT-6.1 Terra
LiveBench long agentic48.6%28.8%GPT-6.1 Terra
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)15.2%32.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)26.0%34.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)1.7%7.5%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
APEX-Agents68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning88.7%82.9%GPT-6.1 Terra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%48.0%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Mystery game puzzles74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
EBR-bench78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)35.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tier 492.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
SimpleQA Verified57.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1283Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: UI components1277Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: game dev1348Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: all code categories1295Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench design82.3%74.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Vals Index60.5%53.8%GPT-6.1 Terra
LiveBench data analysis82.3%71.4%GPT-6.1 Terra
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%79.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
Furniture assembly79.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
MultiChallenge74.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.0035Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.065Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.250Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6.1 Terra and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 Flash
MakerOpenAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 26, 2026October 19, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$5.00$0.60
Coding index77.458.9
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6.1 Terra better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding?

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.9 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Terra or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison based on?

21 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-6.1 Terra's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3.1 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash" title="GPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash</a></p>