Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.6 Terra ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.00
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
25.8
Output $/M
$4.00
vs $12.00 vs $4.00 per 1M output tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.0x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.6 Terra Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.6 Terra Pro has none yet; Kimi K2.7 Code on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro not benchmarked, Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro $12.00 against Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index17 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1474Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.8Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured25.4%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured44.7%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdMLNot measured54.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ALE-BenchNot measured886.2Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1475Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1451Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1513Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured25.8Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.1Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.0Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1175Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1147Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1131Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1201Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1154Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured90.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,083Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured54.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured12.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured36.5%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1264Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1259Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1220Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1227Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1241Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1253Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1196Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Terra ProKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
IFBenchNot measured63.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro$0.0080Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro$0.136Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro$0.520Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra ProMoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerOpenAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 9, 2026June 12, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.95
Output $/Mtok$12.00$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked53.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.6 Terra Pro better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.6 Terra Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GPT-5.6 Terra Pro has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code?

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.7 Code only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Terra Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code?

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.6 Terra Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.6 Terra Pro has none yet; Kimi K2.7 Code on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next