Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.3-Codex vs Mistral Large

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI
Coding
60.0
Overall
32.5
Output $/M
$14.00
5
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.8
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

Only GPT-5.3-Codex has a coding score, 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Mistral Large has the edge where output tokens cost 2.3x less.

Shared results
5
GPT-5.3-Codex only
29
Mistral Large only
39
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.3-Codex 60.0 from 3 benchmarks, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 50.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-5.3-Codex 91.5% against Mistral Large 35.1%, 56.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.3-Codex $14.00 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.3-Codex takes 400K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.3-CodexBarsMistral LargeTies
Coding10
Intelligence20
Reasoning20
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
LMArena WebDev1407Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%37.1%GPT-5.3-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
IOI (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.8%Only Mistral Large measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench78.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
WeirdML79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1655.2Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1274Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena WebDev: React1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1422Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1443Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index32.55.8GPT-5.3-Codex
Epoch Capabilities Index157.1122.1GPT-5.3-Codex
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1032Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps983Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1053Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1084Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1124Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
τ²-Bench Telecom86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
METR time horizons74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,940Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.5%35.1%GPT-5.3-Codex
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.5%3.5%GPT-5.3-Codex
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1208Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.5%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1255Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1238Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
Design Arena: websites1163Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1137Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1161Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1163Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: 3D1008Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1145Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: SVG1129Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1151Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
IFBench75.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
DTBenchNot measured60.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena TextNot measured1265Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1249Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1284Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1235Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1239Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1170Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1202Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1325Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1252Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1157Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1230Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.0088Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Large costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.130Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Large costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.490Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mistral Large costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.3-Codex and Mistral Large
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.3-CodexMistral Large
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 24, 2026February 26, 2024
Context window400K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.75$2.00
Output $/Mtok$14.00$6.00
Coding index60.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.59Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.3-Codex better than Mistral Large for coding?

Only GPT-5.3-Codex has a coding score, 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Mistral Large has the edge where output tokens cost 2.3x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3-Codex or Mistral Large?

GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75 per million input tokens and $14.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.3-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.3-Codex or Mistral Large?

GPT-5.3-Codex, with 400K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.3-Codex vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.3-Codex's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next