Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling 2 Small

Inkling 2 Small leads GPT-5.1-Codex on coding, 48.9 to 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling 2 Small costs 10.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
T Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines
Coding
48.9
Overall
56.9
Output $/M
$1.00
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

GPT-5.1-Codex or Inkling 2 Small: which to pick

Pick Inkling 2 Small for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex.

GPT-5.1-Codex is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
5
GPT-5.1-Codex only
20
Inkling 2 Small only
46
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling 2 Small 48.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 51.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5.1-Codex 13.1% against Inkling 2 Small 81.5%, 68.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Inkling 2 Small $1.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Inkling 2 Small 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-CodexBarsInkling 2 SmallTies
Coding03
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev13381647Inkling 2 Small
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured12.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%81.5%Inkling 2 Small
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
SciCodeNot measured52.3%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
FrontierCode 2.0Not measured25.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1455Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1443Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1660Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13461661Inkling 2 Small
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured97.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.057.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured30.6Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps994Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured21.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured32.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured46.8%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
MCP AtlasNot measured85.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%44.1%Inkling 2 Small
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ARC-AGINot measured96.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured81.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1421Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1478Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1424Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
MathArenaNot measured42.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AA-OmniscienceNot measured16.1Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1409Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1415Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites1154Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1227Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1127Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1142Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured56.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured88.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
IFBench70.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%83.3%Inkling 2 Small
GDPval-AANot measured1630Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena TextNot measured1403Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1408Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1348Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1418Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1377Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1408Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1403Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1381Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1359Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexInkling 2 SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.0008Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.018Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.070Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Inkling 2 Small
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexThinking Machines Inkling 2 Small
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025November 9, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.30
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.00
Coding index15.348.9
Independent measurements behind it23
Cost per solved task$0.892Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Inkling 2 Small for coding?

Pick Inkling 2 Small for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex. GPT-5.1-Codex is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Inkling 2 Small?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Inkling 2 Small costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Inkling 2 Small?

Inkling 2 Small, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling 2 Small comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling 2 Small's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small" title="GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling 2 Small, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.1-Codex vs Inkling 2 Small</a></p>