Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads GPT-5.1-Codex on coding, 61.1 to 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Step 5 Preview costs 3.7x less per output token ($2.70 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
6
vs boards won of 6 shared

GPT-5.1-Codex or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex.

GPT-5.1-Codex is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
6
GPT-5.1-Codex only
20
Step 5 Preview only
55
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 41.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5.1-Codex 13.1% against Step 5 Preview 70.4%, 57.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-CodexBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards06
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev13371567Step 5 Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%70.4%Step 5 Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1485Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1473Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13461556Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.743.7Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1018Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%46.5%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1461Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1485Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1454Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Math Index95.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1458Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1460Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1454Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1439Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1162Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1237Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1138Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IFBench70.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%88.3%Step 5 Preview
LMArena TextNot measured1440Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1409Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1447Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1428Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1500Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1383Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1433Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1437Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1449Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1425Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1412Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerOpenAIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$1.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.70
Coding index15.361.1
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.892Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex. GPT-5.1-Codex is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Step 5 Preview?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="GPT-5.1-Codex vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.1-Codex vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>