Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 cost about the same per output token ($2.00 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
vs $2.00 vs $1.80 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is 1.1x cheaper.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has results on LMArena WebDev, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
LMArena WebDev1244Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1253Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.4Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom62.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIMENot measured86.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
AA Math Index91.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured95.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured25.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites1111Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: UI components1078Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev1092Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz1097Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D988Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories1093Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: SVG978Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1105Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench67.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)66.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCANot measured36.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 400K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has results on LMArena WebDev, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next