Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct leads GPT-4o-mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.3 to 6.7, and GPT-4o-mini costs 1.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $0.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
1
Qwen3 VL 8B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
7
vs boards won of 8 shared

GPT-4o-mini or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.75 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
8
GPT-4o-mini only
21
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 16.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: GPT-4o-mini 14.7 against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 30.7, 16.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct $0.75 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsQwen3 VL 8B InstructTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning11
Math02
Knowledge01
General01
All shared boards17
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index11.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%35.3%Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.77.3Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured29.2%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%57.9%Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%3.8%GPT-4o-mini
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.730.7Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%30.7%Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%74.9%Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
MMLU81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
IFBench31.0%39.9%Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured33.3%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
DTBench54.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMCA10.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.015Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.058Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024October 14, 2025
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.75
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.75 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next