Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs Mistral Small 3

GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3 tie on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 6.7, and Mistral Small 3 costs 7.5x less per output token ($0.08 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
4
Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.08
3
vs boards won of 8 shared, 1 tied

GPT-4o-mini or Mistral Small 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
8
GPT-4o-mini only
21
Mistral Small 3 only
28
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 10.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: GPT-4o-mini 14.7 against Mistral Small 3 4.3, 10.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against Mistral Small 3 $0.08 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, Mistral Small 3 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsMistral Small 3Ties
Coding01
Intelligence001 tie
Reasoning11
Math20
Knowledge01
General10
All shared boards431 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
AA Coding Index11.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%25.2%Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1248Only Mistral Small 3 measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.76.7Tie
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured19.6%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
GPQA Diamond44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%46.2%Mistral Small 3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%3.8%GPT-4o-mini
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1233Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1202Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.74.3GPT-4o-mini
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%4.3%GPT-4o-mini
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1240Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
MMLU Pro62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%65.2%Mistral Small 3
MMLU81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1235Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1215Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1219Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1205Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
IFBench31.0%26.4%GPT-4o-mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
DTBench54.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMCA10.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1234Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1194Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1256Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1198Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1211Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1111Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1188Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1216Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1217Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1184Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0001Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3$0.011Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and Mistral Small 3
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniMistral Small 3
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024January 30, 2025
Context window128K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.05
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than Mistral Small 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Mistral Small 3?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or Mistral Small 3?

GPT-4o-mini, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs Mistral Small 3 comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next