GPT-4o-mini vs Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads GPT-4o-mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 6.7, and GPT-4o-mini costs 3.8x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.30 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 19 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-4o-mini or Kimi K2 0711: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.30 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 19
- GPT-4o-mini only
- 10
- Kimi K2 0711 only
- 18
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads, 12.7 against 6.7.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads, 71.5% against 44.2%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads, 62.7% against 11.5%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads, 79.4% against 62.7%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Kimi K2 0711 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1050.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 takes 131K tokens against 128K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-4o-mini
GPT-4o-mini $0.0004, Kimi K2 0711 $0.0017 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, Kimi K2 0711 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 38.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AIME: GPT-4o-mini 11.5% against Kimi K2 0711 62.7%, 51.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, Kimi K2 0711 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-4o-mini | Bars | Kimi K2 0711 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 5 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 19 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 59.1% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 11.4 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 26.4% | 70.5% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.4% | 55.6% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 15.9% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 27.8% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 4.9% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 39.4% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| SciCode | 1.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.7 | 12.7 | Kimi K2 0711 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.5 | 140.0 | Kimi K2 0711 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 61.1% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 44.2% | 71.5% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 56.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.6% | 76.6% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.2% | 7.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 26.3% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 64.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 11.5% | 62.7% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 72.6% | 94.2% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 86.2% | 91.0% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| AA Math Index | 14.7 | 57.0 | Kimi K2 0711 |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.7% | 57.0% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| GSM8K | 91.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 62.7% | 79.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 81.5% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 45.5% | 50.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 60.5% | 70.2% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 54.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 72.4% | 84.0% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 64.8% | 82.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MMLU | 81.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1050 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1030 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 974 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1018 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1033 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 31.0% | 41.5% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 53.0% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| DTBench | 54.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| LMCA | 10.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 61.1% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 85.6% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 11.9% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| PIQA | 88.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o-mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4o-mini | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-4o-mini costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-4o-mini costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-4o-mini costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-4o-mini | MoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | July 18, 2024 | July 11, 2025 |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.15 | $0.57 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.60 | $2.30 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-4o-mini better than Kimi K2 0711 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.30 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Kimi K2 0711?
GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 and $2.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or Kimi K2 0711?
Kimi K2 0711, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs Kimi K2 0711 comparison based on?
19 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2 0711's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.