Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) cost about the same per output token ($0.60 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
1
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-4o-mini or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
GPT-4o-mini only
28
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
45
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 5.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MMLU: GPT-4o-mini 81.8% against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 76.7%, 5.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $0.60 per million output tokens.
Context window
Both take 128K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Knowledge10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
AA Coding Index11.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured11.8%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1290Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1291Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
BALROGNot measured17.4%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
GPQA Diamond44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured37.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SimpleBenchNot measured10.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured3.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured12.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1234Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1278Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.9%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured0.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 5Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1271Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
MMLU Pro62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured8.3%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU81.8%76.7%GPT-4o-mini
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1305Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
IFBench31.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
DTBench54.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMCA10.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured67.2%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1258Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1268Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1066Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1301Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1266Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1272Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1216Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1195Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1297Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1276Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1275Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1244Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1285Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1289Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1253Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1072Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1033Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

Same cost

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

Same cost

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

Same cost

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024July 18, 2024
Context window128K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Neither: both take 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next