Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Qwen3 30B A3B

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.4 to 7.6, and Qwen3 30B A3B costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
2
Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
3
vs boards won of 5 shared

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Qwen3 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for a larger context window (128K against 41K tokens) and work measured by WeirdML or GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run), where it leads.

Shared results
5
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
19
Qwen3 30B A3B only
48
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 56.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 6.3% against Qwen3 30B A3B 62.8%, 56.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsQwen3 30B A3BTies
Coding01
Intelligence10
Reasoning01
Math01
General10
All shared boards23
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%29.8%Qwen3 30B A3B
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1337Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1340Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.47.6GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured137.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured61.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%61.7%Qwen3 30B A3B
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1329Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
AA Math IndexNot measured72.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%62.8%Qwen3 30B A3B
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1355Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1363Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
MathArenaNot measured9.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1321Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1318Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1308Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured954Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured943Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured898Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured967Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured941Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured41.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
DTBenchNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMCANot measured15.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured40.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%75.3%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
LMArena TextNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1283Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1271Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1335Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1295Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1347Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1307Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1254Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1261Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1352Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1291Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1299Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1307Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1312Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1290Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1258Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Qwen3 30B A3B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen3 30B A3B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024April 28, 2025
Context window128K41K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.12
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than Qwen3 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for a larger context window (128K against 41K tokens) and work measured by WeirdML or GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Qwen3 30B A3B?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Qwen3 30B A3B?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20), with 128K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next