Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs o3 Pro

o3 Pro leads GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.9 to 8.4, and GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs 8.0x less per output token ($10.00 vs $80.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
o3 ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$80.00
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or o3 Pro: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $80.00 per million) and work measured by Aider polyglot or WeirdML, where it leads.

Shared results
4
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
20
o3 Pro only
8
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked, o3 Pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 49.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Aider polyglot: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 18.2% against o3 Pro 84.9%, 66.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against o3 Pro $80.00 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, o3 Pro 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Barso3 ProTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
General01
All shared boards04
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
Aider polyglot18.2%84.9%o3 Pro
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%58.2%o3 Pro
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.421.9o3 Pro
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.3Only o3 Pro measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.5%Only o3 Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ARC-AGINot measured59.3%Only o3 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured4.9%Only o3 Pro measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured72.1%Only o3 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
MMLU Pro72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
DTBenchNot measured86.9%Only o3 Pro measured
LMCANot measured38.5%Only o3 Pro measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured97.2%Only o3 Pro measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%84.4%o3 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)o3 ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
o3 Pro$0.060Fits in one request

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
o3 Pro$1.24Fits in one request

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
o3 Pro$4.80Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and o3 Pro
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI o3 Pro
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024June 10, 2025
Context window128K200K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$20.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$80.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than o3 Pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $80.00 per million) and work measured by Aider polyglot or WeirdML, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or o3 Pro?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; o3 Pro costs $20.00 and $80.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or o3 Pro?

o3 Pro, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs o3 Pro comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o3 Pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next