Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Mistral Medium 3

Mistral Medium 3 leads GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.0 to 8.4, and Mistral Medium 3 costs 5.0x less per output token ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Mistral Medium 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
23
Mistral Medium 3 only
56
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 0.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 8.4 against Mistral Medium 3 9.0, 0.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsMistral Medium 3Ties
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index8.49.0Mistral Medium 3
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured134.0Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured24.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
GPQA Diamond53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.1%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1342Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1155Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
AA Math IndexNot measured30.3Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1354Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
MMLU Pro72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1022Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1017Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1034Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1083Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1068Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
IFBenchNot measured39.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured31.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
DTBenchNot measured62.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1370Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1338Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1343Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1157Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1377Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1316Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1304Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1368Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1359Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1371Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1360Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1335Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1161Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1154Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1094Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1146Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Mistral Medium 3
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Mistral Medium 3
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024May 7, 2025
Context window128K131K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.40
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Mistral Medium 3?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Mistral Medium 3?

Mistral Medium 3, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next