Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 5.6x less per output token than GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ($1.80 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
26.3
Output $/M
$10.00
3
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
8
vs boards won of 11 shared

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI) or MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
11
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
47
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
14
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 76.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 6.4% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 86.7%, 80.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-08-06)BarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Reasoning12
Math02
Knowledge24
All shared boards38
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Aider polyglot23.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench Lite21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: coding1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom28.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)64.0%22.8%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.2%84.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SimpleBench17.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Chess puzzles6.0%8.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1264Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: expert1241Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIME14.0%86.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MATH 500 (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.4%86.7%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH level 553.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: math1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU Pro74.1%87.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.1%85.1%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)39.4%65.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.0%60.8%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
MedQA (Vals AI)88.2%95.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SimpleQA Verified26.0%25.4%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
MMLU84.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: science1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1252Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1232Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCANot measured36.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision1065Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: English1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1254Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: German1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1218Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: French1263Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1269Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1279Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1009Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 6, 2024April 27, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.30
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for work measured by MMMU Pro (Vals AI) or MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next