Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

GPT-4.1 leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 9.9, and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 4.2x less per output token ($1.90 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 49 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4.1OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
36.5
Output $/M
$8.00
3
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
46
vs boards won of 49 shared

GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4.1 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
49
GPT-4.1 only
43
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 31.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4.1 34.7% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 88.3%, 53.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 $8.00 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding13
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning07
Math04
Knowledge05
General126
All shared boards346
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified39.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)45.7%64.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%11.4%GPT-4.1
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ALE-Bench558.1Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding13901438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT13911442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.79.9GPT-4.1
Epoch Capabilities Index136.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%54.1%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)54.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
BrowseComp-Plus36.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond65.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.6%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%11.9%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI5.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI-20.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleBench27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13841428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert13641442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13931439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagrams12151255Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: homework12481277Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AIME39.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
AA Math Index34.788.3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%88.3%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MATH level 583.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math13691425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work13601419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.6%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SimpleQA Verified31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
GeoBench72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science13821444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13791431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government13991438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance13691433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1038Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components997Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1079Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1104Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D849Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1025Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index126
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench43.0%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)68.3%63.7%GPT-4.1
DTBench68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMCA25.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text13831420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following13671406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13631366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision12101247Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: English13921429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English13701405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese13821463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German13811424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13191385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean13381394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French13821452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish13761428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian13771408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish13891419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn13971428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries13851419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13711392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13651368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: English12091256Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: Chinese12261283Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: reading text12181253Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: humor11961209Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: captioning12071281Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12081249Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: creative writing12101220Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.0060Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.124Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.480Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 14, 2025September 23, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.21
Output $/Mtok$8.00$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$0.37Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT-4.1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next