GPT-4.1 vs Mistral Medium 3
Updated October 21, 2026. 57 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
GPT-4.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens, and where what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or Design Arena: websites, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 57
- GPT-4.1 only
- 30
- Mistral Medium 3 only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1 leads, 12.7 against 9.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has a GPQA Diamond result, 65.4%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has a AIME result, 39.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has a MMLU Pro result, 80.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Medium 3 leads, 1079 against 1039.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1 takes 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3
GPT-4.1 $0.0060, Mistral Medium 3 $0.0014 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has the number, $0.37.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-4.1 not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 22.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GPT-4.1 68.3% against Mistral Medium 3 31.3%, 37.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-4.1 $8.00 against Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-4.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-4.1 | Bars | Mistral Medium 3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 7 | 0 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 2 | 4 | ||
| General | 28 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 52 | 5 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 52.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | 39.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | 31.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 54.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 45.7% | 40.0% | GPT-4.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.6% | 3.8% | GPT-4.1 |
| WeirdML | 39.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 558.1 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1390 | 1385 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1391 | 1385 | GPT-4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 12.7 | 9.0 | GPT-4.1 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 136.7 | 134.0 | GPT-4.1 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 47.1% | 24.3% | GPT-4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 72.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 66.6% | 57.8% | GPT-4.1 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.2% | 4.1% | GPT-4.1 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 66.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 5.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SimpleBench | 27.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 3.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1384 | 1364 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1364 | 1342 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1393 | 1374 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1215 | 1155 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1248 | 1165 | GPT-4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 39.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 87.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 87.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| AA Math Index | 34.7 | 30.3 | GPT-4.1 |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 34.7% | 30.3% | GPT-4.1 |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 38.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 6.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MATH level 5 | 83.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1369 | 1353 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1360 | 1354 | GPT-4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 80.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 69.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 63.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 65.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 91.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.6% | 76.0% | GPT-4.1 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 31.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| GeoBench | 72.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1382 | 1381 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1379 | 1381 | Mistral Medium 3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1399 | 1384 | GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1369 | 1352 | GPT-4.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1039 | 1079 | Mistral Medium 3 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1000 | 1024 | Mistral Medium 3 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1079 | 1018 | GPT-4.1 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1104 | 1034 | GPT-4.1 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 850 | 1083 | Mistral Medium 3 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1026 | 1069 | Mistral Medium 3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index280
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Mistral Medium 3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Mistral Medium 3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | April 14, 2025 | May 7, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.40 |
| Output $/Mtok | $8.00 | $2.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.37 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-4.1 better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GPT-4.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens, and where what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or Design Arena: websites, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Mistral Medium 3?
GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 or Mistral Medium 3?
GPT-4.1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison based on?
57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.