Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 vs Mistral Large 3 2512

GPT-4.1 leads Mistral Large 3 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 2512 costs 5.3x less per output token ($1.50 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4.1OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
36.5
Output $/M
$8.00
13
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
8
vs boards won of 22 shared, 1 tied

GPT-4.1 or Mistral Large 3 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4.1 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.37 against $0.77) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
22
GPT-4.1 only
70
Mistral Large 3 2512 only
6
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 not benchmarked, Mistral Large 3 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 13.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GPT-4.1 850 against Mistral Large 3 2512 1100, 31.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 $8.00 against Mistral Large 3 2512 $1.50 per million output tokens, 5.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 3 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1BarsMistral Large 3 2512Ties
Coding11
Intelligence10
Reasoning11
Math11
Knowledge70
Web design051 tie
General20
All shared boards1381 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
Aider polyglot52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified39.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.1Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)54.7%55.3%Mistral Large 3 2512
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)45.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ALE-Bench558.1264.7GPT-4.1
LMArena Text: coding1390Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1391Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.79.3GPT-4.1
Epoch Capabilities Index136.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)54.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
BrowseComp-Plus36.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond65.4%68.4%Mistral Large 3 2512
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)72.4%66.2%GPT-4.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI5.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI-20.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleBench27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1384Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1364Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1393Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1215Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1248Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
AIME39.6%42.9%Mistral Large 3 2512
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.7%85.4%GPT-4.1
AA Math Index34.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MATH level 583.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math1369Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1360Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
MMLU Pro80.5%79.8%GPT-4.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.1%79.1%GPT-4.1
CaseLaw (Vals AI)69.9%61.4%GPT-4.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.0%61.0%GPT-4.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.1%73.1%GPT-4.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.9%52.1%GPT-4.1
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%82.2%GPT-4.1
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
GeoBench72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science1382Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1379Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1399Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1369Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites10391162Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: UI components10001102Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: game dev10801080Tie
Design Arena: data viz11041136Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: 3D8501100Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: all code categories10261142Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1069Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured24.6%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
IFBench43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
DTBench68.3%65.1%GPT-4.1
LMCA25.6%16.7%GPT-4.1
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text1383Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1367Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1363Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision1210Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: English1392Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1370Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1382Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: German1381Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1319Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1338Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: French1382Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1376Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1377Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1389Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1397Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1385Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1371Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1365Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: English1209Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1226Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1218Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1196Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1207Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1208Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1210Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.0060Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.0013Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.124Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.029Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.480Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.115Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 and Mistral Large 3 2512
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1Mistral Large 3 2512
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 14, 2025December 1, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.50
Output $/Mtok$8.00$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved task$0.37$0.77
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Mistral Large 3 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.37 against $0.77) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Mistral Large 3 2512?

GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 2512 costs $0.50 and $1.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-4.1 costs $0.37 and Mistral Large 3 2512 $0.77.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 or Mistral Large 3 2512?

GPT-4.1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 vs Mistral Large 3 2512 comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 3 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next