Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct leads GPT-4.1 Nano on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.6 to 7.8, at about the same output price ($0.44 vs $0.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.44
13
vs boards won of 14 shared, 1 tied

GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4.1 Nano for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.44 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
14
GPT-4.1 Nano only
57
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
2
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 Nano not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 18.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: data viz: GPT-4.1 Nano 891 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 1085, 24.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 Nano $0.40 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.44 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1 NanoBarsQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning011 tie
Math02
Knowledge01
Web design03
General02
All shared boards0131 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot8.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured60.4%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured49.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AA Coding Index11.1Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)42.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%40.3%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%15.2%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
WeirdML19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: coding1306Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1305Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.89.6Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index129.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom17.3%34.5%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)33.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond50.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)51.2%51.6%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%3.8%Tie
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
ARC-AGI0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Chess puzzles0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: expert1271Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AIME26.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MGSM (Vals AI)69.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
AA Math Index24.029.0Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)24.0%29.0%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME28.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MATH level 570.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: math1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro63.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)42.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MedQA (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)65.7%70.6%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SimpleQA Verified6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: science1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1276Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1300Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites9721087Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Design Arena: UI components9131043Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Design Arena: game dev970Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Design Arena: data viz8911085Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Design Arena: 3D924Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Design Arena: all code categories962Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
IFBench32.0%32.7%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)20.3%32.7%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
DTBench52.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMCA5.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Fiction.LiveBench25.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1266Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Vision1063Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English1303Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: non-English1260Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1270Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: German1288Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1198Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Russian1261Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1261Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1243Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: English1101Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1 Nano$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0003Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Nano$0.0062Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0068Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Nano$0.024Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.026Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1 NanoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 14, 2025July 31, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.11
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.44
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 Nano better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 Nano for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.44 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.11 and $0.44. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-4.1 Nano, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4.1 Nano's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next