GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3 30B A3B
GPT-4.1 Nano leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.8 to 7.6, and GPT-4.1 Nano costs 1.3x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 47 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3 30B A3B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GPT-4.1 Nano for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 41K tokens).
- Shared results
- 47
- GPT-4.1 Nano only
- 24
- Qwen3 30B A3B only
- 6
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano leads, 7.8 against 7.6.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-4.1 Nano has a GPQA Diamond result, 50.8%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-4.1 Nano has a AIME result, 26.5%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-4.1 Nano has a MMLU Pro result, 63.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano leads, 973 against 954.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1.05M tokens against 41K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano $0.0003, Qwen3 30B A3B $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-4.1 Nano not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 31.7 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4.1 Nano 24.0% against Qwen3 30B A3B 72.3%, 48.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-4.1 Nano $0.40 against Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B 41K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-4.1 Nano | Bars | Qwen3 30B A3B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 5 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| Web design | 3 | 2 | ||
| General | 1 | 17 | ||
| All shared boards | 5 | 42 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 8.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| AA Coding Index | 11.1 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 42.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 32.6% | 50.6% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | 6.8% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| WeirdML | 19.0% | 29.8% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1306 | 1337 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1305 | 1340 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.8 | 7.6 | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.5 | 137.3 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 17.3% | 26.0% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 33.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 50.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 55.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 51.2% | 61.6% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | 6.2% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 48.9% | 61.7% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| ARC-AGI | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Chess puzzles | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1286 | 1314 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1271 | 1314 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1293 | 1329 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 26.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 69.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| AA Math Index | 24.0 | 72.3 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 24.0% | 72.3% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 28.9% | 62.8% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| MATH level 5 | 70.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1274 | 1355 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1274 | 1363 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| MathArena | Not measured | 9.4% | Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 63.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 61.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 42.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 60.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 52.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 68.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 65.7% | 77.7% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1297 | 1321 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1276 | 1318 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1300 | 1314 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1267 | 1309 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 973 | 954 | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Design Arena: UI components | 913 | 943 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Design Arena: game dev | 970 | 898 | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Design Arena: data viz | 891 | 967 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Design Arena: 3D | 924 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 962 | 941 | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index117
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 32.0% | 41.5% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 20.3% | 0.0% | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 60.3% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMCA | 5.5% | 15.8% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25.0% | 40.6% | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 75.3% | Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text | 1285 | 1317 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1266 | 1283 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1260 | 1271 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1303 | 1335 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1260 | 1295 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1270 | 1347 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: German | 1288 | 1307 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1198 | 1254 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1261 | Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1352 | Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1317 | Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1261 | 1291 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1299 | Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1277 | 1307 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1283 | 1312 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1261 | 1290 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1243 | 1258 | Qwen3 30B A3B |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1101 | Not measured | Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-4.1 Nano | Qwen3 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | April 14, 2025 | April 28, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 41K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $0.12 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-4.1 Nano better than Qwen3 30B A3B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 Nano for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 41K tokens).
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3 30B A3B?
GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3 30B A3B?
GPT-4.1 Nano, with 1.05M tokens against 41K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison based on?
47 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4.1 Nano's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.