Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 cost about the same per output token ($1.60 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
31.9
Output $/M
$1.60
2
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
15
vs boards won of 17 shared

GPT-4.1 Mini or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.60 vs $1.80 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
17
GPT-4.1 Mini only
71
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
8
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 Mini not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 39.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MMMU Pro (Vals AI): GPT-4.1 Mini 70.5% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 22.8%, 47.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 Mini takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1 MiniBarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning14
Math02
Knowledge15
General02
All shared boards215
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Aider polyglot32.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified23.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Coding Index20.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)58.2%85.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)48.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
WeirdML37.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ALE-BenchNot measured608.9Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: coding1367Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1360Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities Index134.9146.2Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)50.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA Diamond67.9%87.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)70.5%22.8%GPT-4.1 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.8%84.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
ARC-AGI3.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Chess puzzles1.0%8.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Mystery game puzzles7.0%17.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMArena Text: hard prompts1349Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1338Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1362Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1214Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIME49.4%86.0%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math Index46.3Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)46.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME44.7%86.7%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH level 587.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1343Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1347Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU Pro77.2%87.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LegalBench (Vals AI)78.0%85.1%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.9%65.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.5%60.8%GPT-4.1 Mini
MedQA (Vals AI)84.6%95.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified12.7%25.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMArena Text: science1328Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1324Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1343Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1322Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
PRBench Finance30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
PRBench Legal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites997Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI components959Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev1070Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz1034Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D836Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories993Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
IFBench38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)44.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
DTBench68.8%80.5%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LMCA21.1%36.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
CL-benchNot measured19.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured12.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text1341Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1333Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1299Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1181Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1356Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1318Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1358Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1319Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1324Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1326Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1354Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1344Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1319Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1300Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1191Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1186Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1188Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1174Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1187Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Same cost

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 Mini and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1 MiniQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 14, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.60$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved task$1.818$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 Mini better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.60 vs $1.80 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Mini or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-4.1 Mini costs $1.818 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.35.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Mini or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

GPT-4.1 Mini, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Mini vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4.1 Mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next